In the past week a recent post from Zane Koch, a PhD longevity researcher, about EMFs increasing lifespan has gone viral. Zane extracted data from the famous and highly controversial NTP radio frequency study and found something unexpected…most of the rodents (rats and mice) that were exposed to high SAR 2G/3G “like” RF-EMFs actually ended up living longer. How could this be when the headline conclusion of the study was that the rats had a statistically significant risk increase in cancer of the heart?
TLDR: EMFs are more complex than any human mind is able to comprehend.
Watch my video response if you actually want to learn something, but here is a short summary:
The NTP study, as almost all EMF studies are, was extremely flawed in its design.
Rats and mice are not human, and the RF exposure does not translate to indicative day to day exposure.
Yes, EMFs can be good for you. The devil is in the dose, frequency, directionality, ambient EMF environment, and duration.
We need to research EMFs and its impact on our biology in more realistic exposure scenarios to a much higher degree.
Modern technology is creating “noise” at the biological level. This is not beneficial. This is not a targeted therapy or longevity pill.
Humans think they are smarter than they actually are and have lost touch with their ability to intuitively feel if something is good for their body or not.
[Skip to the last 3 min of the video if you want the real juice].
-Tristan
